News

On 23 July 2026, Soka Gakkai International (SGI) issued a statement entitled Autonomous Weapons Systems: Ensuring Human Control Based on Respect for the Dignity of Life. In the statement, issued ahead of the Seventh Review Conference of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) scheduled for November 2026, SGI calls for the urgent establishment of an international regulatory framework governing Autonomous Weapons Systems, including those employing AI, and a comprehensive prohibition on systems designed to select and engage human targets. The statement highlights the growing number of states calling for the start of treaty negotiations and references the encyclical from Pope Leo XIV Magnifica Humanitas: On Safeguarding the Human Person in the Time of Artificial Intelligence, issued in May 2026 in which he writes: "AI does not remove the intrinsic inhumanity of conflict; indeed, it can only bring about conflict more quickly and render it more impersonal, lowering the threshold for resorting to violence, transforming defense into threat prediction and thus reducing victims to data. In this way, it will accustom us to the idea that violence is inevitable and needs only to be optimized." In 2014, President Daisaku Ikeda (1928–2023) issued the following warning in his dialogue with peace scholar and Toda Peace Institute Honorary Director, Dr. Kevin Clements: “Robotic weapons, when given a command to attack, automatically go on killing, without the intervention of human will, and accordingly, with no possibility of pangs of conscience or remorse. They present an extremely grave threat, particularly from a humanitarian perspective. The possession of such weapons, just like that of nuclear weapons, is underpinned by the cold logic of the utter and complete annihilation of assumed enemies, with no discrimination between civilians and combatants.” The 2026 statement concludes with a strong argument for preventing destruction and division through a shift in perspective, which SGI has actively pursued through interfaith and intercultural dialogue to address global issues, including disarmament and human rights, while consistently promoting grassroots cultural and educational exchanges.  A link to the full statement from Soka Gakkai International can be found here.

Workshop participants in Tokyo Toda Peace Institute, in collaboration with Metagov, held a workshop as part of its “Social Media, Technology, and Peacebuilding” program in Tokyo from July 29 to 31, 2026, on the theme of “Interoperable Deliberative Tools in the Asia-Pacific Region.” Participants included Dr. Lisa Schirch, Senior Research Fellow of the Toda Peace Institute, who leads the program, and Ms. Liz Barry, Executive Director of Metagov, as well as researchers, practitioners, and technology developers from 14 countries and regions—primarily in the Asia-Pacific region—engaged in fields such as peacebuilding, deliberative democracy, civic tech, AI, public administration, civil society, journalism, and conflict resolution. The workshop aimed to visualise deliberative processes being implemented in various regions, examine who is making key decisions and where, and identify recurring challenges, with the goal of exploring how to connect multiple technologies with human activities. During the meeting, participants discussed: (1) developing practices related to security, privacy, identity, interoperability, data sovereignty, and information integrity; (2) exploring the potential for building systems that incorporate local cultural traditions and wisdom in facilitation, and (3) comparing and examining various approaches to institutionalising deliberative systems and their impacts. Lively discussions took place as participants shared practical examples and challenges from their respective countries and regions. On the final day of the conference, Ms. Audrey Tang, Taiwan’s first Minister of Digital Affairs and a research advisor at Metagov, attended. During the discussion, she stated that democratisation should not be limited to the state or elections alone; rather, it can occur in any setting where people collectively learn to govern—such as schools, cooperatives, local communities, and open-source communities. She expressed the view that while formal democracy is in retreat, accessible technology is giving rise to a broader “civic wave.” Based on the idea of 'civic care' or an 'ethic of care', she also argued that 'care' in the AI context should not be designed merely to maximise individual satisfaction, but rather should be viewed as a means to strengthen interpersonal relationships and mutual capabilities. AI, too, must be used in a way that fosters attentiveness, responsiveness, the ability to cooperate, and civic strength, rather than creating dependency among users. She argued that AI development should be viewed not as a competition to see “who wins,” but as a shared mission to ask “who is being left behind.” Regarding public broadcasting, she pointed out that it has the potential to serve as a platform for “public broad listening”—listening widely to the voices of citizens—rather than merely broadcasting information unilaterally. In the closing discussion, Dr. Schirch summarised that practitioners in Asia are not merely adopting Western technologies but are independently innovating the future of democracy. As concrete outcomes of this workshop, future activities were proposed, including a workshop report to be edited and revised by participants; academic and policy papers introducing AI-assisted democracy in Asia; an open, collaboratively authored handbook for civil society; and the standardisation and publication of the process diagrams created during the workshop. The most important conclusion of this workshop is that excellent deliberative technologies involve not only the introduction of the most advanced AI and multifunctional platforms, but also the design of socially and politically legitimate processes. Digital technology can engage large numbers of people, translate languages, analyse vast amounts of opinions, visualise points of agreement and conflict, and connect people in distant regions. On the other hand, it was also pointed out that these technologies carry the potential to centralise administrative authority, endanger vulnerable participants, homogenise local cultures, create token participation, and make local communities dependent on external corporations. Interoperability of deliberative technologies, in the broadest sense, is not merely about connecting different software systems; rather, it involves creating a state in which technology, institutions, facilitators, local communities, and cultures can collaborate while maintaining their respective differences, thereby enabling a more equitable distribution of power. Senior Research Fellow Lisa Schirch speaks at the workshop

A landmark scholarly event unfolded on the evening of 28 April 2026 at the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat Conference Hall, as some 200 distinguished guests gathered to celebrate the launch of Climate Change in Pasifika Relational Perspectives, a groundbreaking volume that was an outcome of a collaborative project between the Toda Peace Institute and the Pasifika Communities University (PCU). The event, co-hosted by the two institutions, marked a significant milestone in Pacific-centred climate research and brought together diplomats, academics, policymakers, and community leaders in a spirit of shared purpose. Editor John Campbell presents a copy to the Prime Minister of Fiji Distinguished guests at the book launch The evening was graced by the Chief Guest, the Honourable Sitiveni Rabuka, Prime Minister of Fiji, whose presence underscored the deep political resonance of the book's themes. The diplomatic community was also well represented, with the Japanese Ambassador to Fiji among the distinguished guests, reflecting the international significance of the publication. Copies of the book were formally presented to the Prime Minister, the Japanese Ambassador, and other senior guests as a gesture of the volume's importance to regional and global climate conversations. Edited by Upolu Lumā Vaai, Volker Boege, Carol Farbotko, John Campbell, and Tammy Tabe, the book brings together contributions from over twenty scholars across the Pacific and beyond. Also featured are poems by six writers from Marshall Islands, Kiribati, Solomon Islands and Tuvalu, whose work brings a personal and individual perspective to complement the research-focussed chapters. The volume centres Pasifika relational ontologies—the understanding that people, land, sea, and cosmos are deeply interconnected—as a lens through which to examine and respond to the climate crisis. It is a direct challenge to dominant Western framings of climate change and an affirmation that Indigenous Pacific epistemologies have a vital role to play in shaping global climate futures. The project was initiated jointly by the Toda Peace Institute and Pasifika Communities University, reflecting a shared commitment to peacebuilding, environmental justice, and the amplification of Pacific voices in international discourse. Speakers at the launch praised the collaboration as a model for how research institutions can work alongside Pacific communities to produce scholarship that is both academically rigorous and grounded in lived experience. Climate Change in Pasifika Relational Perspectives is now available through PCU Press.

Today marks the 30th anniversary of the founding of the Toda Peace Institute. To celebrate the occasion, the Japanese version of the Toda Peace Institute website carries a timeline of notable events from the past 30 years. In addition, an article in the Seikyo Shimbun features an interview with the new director of Toda Peace Institute, Dr Stein Tønnesson, in which he outlines his dedication to the cause of peace which was established from childhood, as he attended anti-nuclear demonstrations with his father. He remembers his mother trembling with fear during the Cuban Missile Crisis. "I was also influenced by my encounter with Dr. Daisaku Ikeda, founder of the Toda Peace Institute," said Dr Tønnesson. "As the then-director of the International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO), I visited Japan in 2002 to present Dr. Ikeda with an award for his contributions to peace studies. Whatimpressed me most during our meeting was Dr. Ikeda's willingness to listen and learn. Rather than expressing his own views, he asked carefully prepared questions and listened intently to what I had to say. It seemed as though Dr. Ikeda expected me to speak more than he did. This spirit of dialogue is the key to overcoming the divisions of our time."

In his final annual address, speaking to the UN General Assembly, UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned that the world is “brimming with conflict, impunity, inequality and unpredictability” – even as international cooperation is fraying at the moment it is most needed. His address outlined his three guiding priorities. The address is presented here in full. Excellencies, Happy new year.  I wish you and your families peace and health in 2026.  It is tradition for the Secretary-General to come before the General Assembly and present priorities for the year ahead.  Today, I do so for the final time. Let me assure you that I will make every day of 2026 count.  I am fully committed and fully determined to keep working, to keep fighting, and to keep pushing for the better world that we know is possible. We already have had the benefit of the President of the General Assembly briefing you yesterday on the agenda for this year.  And there is no shortage of urgent tasks before us – especially as we build on the Pact for the Future and the UN80 initiative.  So today, I want to use this traditional moment for something slightly non-traditional.  I want to look not only to this year, but beyond – and to speak candidly about the larger forces and megatrends shaping our world, and the deeper challenges we must confront.  Rather than a checklist, I want to zero in on three principles that must guide our work.  But let me begin with the context. Excellencies, let’s be clear.  The context is chaos.  We are a world brimming with conflict, impunity, inequality, and unpredictability. A world marked by self-defeating geopolitical divides … brazen violations of international law … and wholesale cuts in development and humanitarian aid.  These forces and more are shaking the foundations of global cooperation and testing the resilience of multilateralism itself. That is the paradox of our era: at a time when we need international cooperation the most, we seem to be the least inclined to use it and invest in it.  Some seek to put international cooperation on deathwatch. I can assure you: we will not give up.  And we are totally committed in the cause of peace in Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan and far beyond – and tireless in delivering life-saving aid to those so desperate for support.  And let’s recognize that even in this turbulence, we have succeeded in claiming space for the United Nations where it was not a given.  We have stepped forward to help shape the global conversation on artificial intelligence – insisting that these powerful forces serve humanity and uphold human dignity.  We have been on the frontlines of efforts to secure fair and sustainable financing for development, pushing for reforms and new mechanisms to leave no country behind. We have been outspoken on the urgent need for climate action, demanding ambition and working to rally governments, businesses and civil society.    Everywhere, we have sought to spotlight the needs of the most vulnerable people and countries. And we will keep pushing in all these areas and more this year. In the next few weeks alone, we will: Launch the Independent Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence to provide impartial, evidence-based assessments of AI’s opportunities, risks and impacts; Put forward the recommendations of the High-Level Expert Group on Beyond GDP to offer new ways to measure progress and well-being and better reflect what truly matters for people and planet; Begin a series of monthly meetings with you on the UN80 Initiative to foster our ongoing dialogue and cooperation to best equip the UN for the future; Present initial assessments on the potential mergers of UNDP with UNOPS as well as UNWomen with UNFPA to enhance efficiency and coherence in our development work; And advance on the peace operations review to make them more effective, responsive, and fit for today’s complex challenges.  This is just a small taste of some immediate next steps.  Across the board, it is full steam ahead.  Excellencies, We are working in a time of dramatic change – and we need to reflect the world as it is.  Disruptions don’t have to be destructive.  They can also be a force of construction.  The UN80 Initiative is about building a UN system that delivers more effectively, more coherently, and with greater impact, amid the reality of shrinking resources and rising needs.  Yes, reform is about resources – and using those resources effectively and efficiently.  Budgets matter – but only if every Member State pays its contributions in full and on time. Today’s situation is totally unsustainable. Either all countries, without exception, honour their financial obligations under the Charter -- which no longer seems to be the case. Or Member States must overhaul our financial rules to prevent a budget breakdown. I will be writing to you in more detail on this matter. But reform must be far more than numbers on a spreadsheet. Reform must be about institutions that reflect today’s world. 1945 problem-solving will not solve 2026 problems.  If structures do not reflect our times, our world, our realities – they will lose legitimacy.  Consider the facts: Every day, the share of global GDP held by developed economies shrinks, bit by bit. Every day, emerging economies grow – in size, in strength, in influence.  Every day, South-South trade pulls further ahead of North-North trade. Our structures must reflect this changing world.  That is why reforming international financial and trade institutions is not just important – it is essential.  The same goes for the Security Council. And I would add that it is manifestly in the interests of those who hold the most power to be on the frontlines of reform.  Those who try to cling to privileges today risk paying the price tomorrow.  And so we must all be bold enough to change. The world is not waiting. Neither should we. Excellencies, As we push forward on reforms, our larger mission must be finding our bearings in this disorienting world. Let me boil it down to three principles that must be at the foundation of all our actions – not just for this year, but for our times.  First, we must adhere to the UN Charter – fully and faithfully. No ifs … no ands … no buts.  The Charter is a compact which binds us all.  It is not an à la carte menu, it is prix fixe.  The Charter is the foundation of international relations – the bedrock of peace, sustainable development, and human rights.  I am honoured to serve as custodian of the Charter. But each one of you has signed up to be a custodian of the Charter, too. When leaders run roughshod over international law – when they pick and choose which rules to follow – they are not only undermining global order, they are setting a perilous precedent.  And let’s be clear:  The erosion of international law is not happening in the shadows.  It is unfolding before the eyes of the world, on our screens, live in 4K.  People everywhere are witnessing, in real time, the consequences of impunity – the illegal use and threat of force; attacks on civilians, humanitarian workers and UN personnel; unconstitutional changes of government; the trampling of human rights; the silencing of dissent; the plundering of resources.  And the dangers do not stop with States or warring parties.  They are being amplified by bottomless greed and inequality.  The top one percent holds 43 percent of global financial assets. And last year alone, the richest 500 individuals added $2.2 trillion to their fortunes.  Increasingly, we see a world where the ultra-wealthiest and the companies they control are calling the shots like never before – wielding outsized influence over economies, information, and even the rules that govern us all. When a handful of individuals can bend global narratives, sway elections, or dictate the terms of public debate, we are not just facing inequality – we are facing the corruption of institutions and our shared values.  Look no further than artificial intelligence – and the algorithms shaping our lives. These are too consequential to be controlled only by a few companies, or optimized only to monetize attention and outrage. For instance, how do we protect our children from the tyranny of the algorithm? We must ensure humanity steers technology, not the other way around.  I thank you for your support for the Independent Scientific Panel on AI, and the Global Dialogue on AI Governance. We need to keep working to build guardrails, accountability, shared standards, and the capacity to bridge the AI divide. The concentration of power and wealth in so few hands is morally indefensible. More than that, it is a clear and present danger to the Charter and the promise of equal rights and dignity for all. That leads to the second principle.  We must be relentless in our work for peace with justice – peace between nations and peace with nature. Peace is at the heart of all we do. Yet as we meet today, the snares of conflict have trapped millions of members of the human family in miserable, prolonged cycles of violence, hunger and  displacement. The suffering cannot go on. In Gaza – I welcome the start of Phase Two of the ceasefire, announced by the US – and reiterate that humanitarian aid must flow unimpeded, the ceasefire must be implemented in full, and the way must be cleared to an irreversible path to a two-state solution in accordance with international law. In Ukraine – where we must spare no effort to stop the fighting and achieve a just and lasting peace in line with the UN Charter, international law and UN  resolutions. In Sudan – where the parties must agree on an immediate cessation of hostilities and the resumption of talks to reach a lasting ceasefire and a comprehensive, inclusive and Sudanese-owned political process. Civilians must be protected. From Yemen to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, from Haiti to the Sahel to Myanmar and around the world, we must never give up in the pursuit for peace. Throughout, we must recognize that silencing the guns is not enough. Peace is more than the absence of war. The root causes of conflict must be addressed.  If not, any solution will be precarious. It’s no coincidence that nine of the ten countries with the lowest Human Development Indicators are currently in a state of conflict.  Sustainable peace requires sustainable development.  Yet ten years after the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals, two-thirds of the targets are lagging.  The world is falling short by over $4 trillion a year in the resources developing countries need to deliver on these promises by 2030. And developing countries are being battered and bruised by limited fiscal space, crushing debt burdens and skyrocketing prices. We must advance on last year’s Sevilla Commitment, which set out an ambitious agenda to scale up finance, address the debt crisis, and reform the international financial architecture so developing countries can invest in the systems that support development and peace.  And peace with justice means peace grounded in international law and on human rights – economic, social, cultural, civil and political – which are inalienable, indivisible and interdependent. We must safeguard freedom of speech and civic space.  On that note, I am deeply concerned by the violent repression in Iran. We must open the doors of opportunity for women and girls around the world. And I want to stress that we cannot – and will not – give in to the disturbing pushback on the rights of women – half of humanity -- and the hard-won gains in equality, participation, and protection. I am proud that we achieved for the first time in UN history gender parity at senior levels. We are stronger for it, and we will keep going. We will also build on progress to expand meaningful engagement with young people – full inclusion for persons with disabilities – and real opportunities for indigenous peoples. All of this is essential to build a more equitable, peaceful, just and sustainable future.  Excellences, Une paix juste suppose aussi de faire la paix avec la nature. Un monde plongé dans le chaos climatique ne peut être un monde en paix. Le changement climatique est un multiplicateur de risques, attisant les tensions autour des terres, de l’eau et de la nourriture ; Chassant les populations de leurs foyers ; Et mettant à mal les écosystèmes dont nous dépendons tous. C’est aussi une profonde injustice : celles et ceux qui ont le moins contribué sont les premiers et les plus durement touchés. Les dirigeants ont échoué à contenir le réchauffement en dessous de 1,5 degré Celsius. Un dépassement temporaire de ce seuil est désormais inévitable – mais pas irreversible. Notre mission est de rendre ce dépassement aussi faible, aussi bref et aussi sûr que possible – et d’infléchir immédiatement la courbe pour revenir vers 1,5 degré. Concrètement, cela demande : D’aller au-delà des plans climatiques nationaux pour réduire les émissions dès maintenant – et continuer à les réduire. Accélérer une transition juste, ordonnée et équitable des combustibles fossiles vers les énergies renouvelables. Doubler l’efficacité énergétique d’ici à 2030 ; développer les réseaux et les systèmes de stockage pour acheminer l’énergie propre partout ; réduire les émissions de méthane ; et mettre fin à la déforestation. Honorer les promesses en matière d’adaptation et de pertes et dommages. Et garantir des financements abordables et prévisibles, qui parviennent à celles et ceux qui en ont besoin, quand ils en ont besoin. Investir dans la justice climatique, c’est investir dans la paix et la sécurité. Car la vulnérabilité, où qu’elle soit, devient un risque partout – avec des répercussions sur les systèmes financiers, les chaînes d’approvisionnement et la stabilité mondiale. Third, and finally, our priority must be to build unity in an age of division.  Around the world, we see the risk of societies breaking down under the weight of racism, nationalist xenophobia, and religious bigotry.  These poisons are corroding the fabric of communities, fuelling division and distrust.  The dangers are not abstract; they are visible in the daily lives of millions, supercharged by rhetoric and disinformation that seeks to exclude rather than embrace.  And it is not enough to denounce these impulses ideologically or to simply say “this is wrong”.  Many people feel left behind. They see wealth all around them, and yet they struggle to get by.  They feel that rapid globalization – together with technological progress -- have undermined their prospects.  They look at large movements of people and are told – falsely – that identity is a zero-sum game. Demographic trends heighten the urgency.  The demographic dividend cannot materialize if young people don’t see the dividends in their own lives. At the same time, aging societies cannot afford to turn inward, to build walls – literally or figuratively.  Doing so is a recipe for stagnation, and worse.  Every country has the sovereign right within the law to manage its borders and ensure its security. But migrants and refugees also have rights – rights that must be respected and protected, wherever they are.  Our challenge – and our priority – must be to build welcoming societies, not walled-off citadels.  Societies that invest in the software of social cohesion, inclusion, education and skills, decent jobs and social protection with a new social contract.   Societies that build communities where everyone’s identity is respected, and all feel they belong and are bound by shared civic values.  Harmony is never accidental. It requires deliberate policy, resources and political courage.  If we fail to put our common humanity first, we risk losing everything that makes us strong. The choice is clear: inclusion or isolation, renewal or decline.  We must build united societies in a world of united nations.  Excellencies, I have spoken plainly because the times demand it.  We cannot afford complacency, denial or delay. We cannot be bystanders to injustice, indifference, or impunity. And we have the power to chart a different course.  The Charter gives us our compass. Our pursuit for peace with justice gives us our purpose. And our common humanity gives us the imperative to act. The world is changing – often in ways that are unsettling, but also in ways that are inspiring.  The forces of division and inequality are powerful – but so too is our capacity for solidarity and justice.  Even in the rough seas of today, we can anchor our action in peace, dignity, and hope.  That takes the best efforts of everyone.  Let’s never forget who we are and what we represent.  The United Nations is a living promise – a promise that despite our differences, we will solve problems together.  Let’s keep that promise.  Let’s never give up.  The stakes could not be higher, and the time could not be shorter.  Thank you.