Global Challenges to Democracy By Jordan Ryan  |  01 October, 2024

Shaping a Sustainable Future Through the UN Pact for the Future

Image: metamorworks/shutterstock.com

The adoption of the UN Pact for the Future at the 2024 Summit of the Future marks a significant step toward addressing some of the world’s most pressing crises. With its focus on inclusivity, intergenerational equity, and sustainability, the Pact presents a bold vision for the future of global governance. Yet, the fundamental question remains: How can we ensure this ambitious Pact leads to tangible action and real, lasting change?

The world stands at a critical juncture, contending with simultaneous crises—the war in Ukraine, the expanding conflict in the Middle East, and the existential threat of climate change. What began as a conflict centered on Gaza has now widened to include an Israeli invasion of Lebanon, representing a significant escalation of hostilities in the region. These challenges are interwoven, creating a global environment that is increasingly difficult to manage. In this context, global governance mechanisms, as they currently function, appear ill-equipped to respond effectively. The UN’s Pact for the Future offers hope for a more coordinated and sustainable approach, but success will depend on our collective ability to address three major challenges: balancing short-term crises with long-term planning, ensuring meaningful accountability, and securing adequate resources for implementation.

A key element of the Pact is the Declaration on Future Generations, which emphasizes the need to safeguard the interests of future citizens by embedding sustainability and equity into decisions made today. This focus on long-term thinking aligns closely with youth-led movements like Fridays for Future which have galvanized global attention on the urgent need for stronger climate action. These movements highlight a powerful truth: the time for short-term thinking is over, and the survival of future generations depends on the decisions we make now.

However, translating the principles of the Declaration into concrete action is a formidable task. Governments and international institutions are constantly managing competing priorities, with immediate crises often overshadowing long-term goals. Conflicts like those in Ukraine and Gaza not only drain political and financial resources but also divert attention from the broader systemic changes that the Pact seeks to address. In such a landscape, there is a very real danger that the ambitions of the Pact will be eclipsed by the demands of the present. Without a sustained commitment from Member States and other key actors, the Pact risks becoming another well-intentioned initiative that struggles to deliver meaningful results.

One of the most significant concerns surrounding the Pact is its voluntary nature. While the principles it sets out are commendable, the lack of enforceable commitments raises serious questions about accountability. Who will ensure that nations, corporations, and other stakeholders uphold their pledges, especially when doing so becomes politically or economically challenging? Voluntary agreements have historically faced difficulties in maintaining momentum, particularly when no formal enforcement mechanisms exist. This is a critical vulnerability of the Pact—without a system for holding actors accountable, its lofty goals may remain unfulfilled promises.

This is where emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain could play a transformative role. AI has the potential to help governments and organizations track and analyze trends over time, offering valuable insights into the long-term impact of policy decisions. By utilizing AI, policymakers could create more effective, data-driven strategies that anticipate future challenges. Blockchain, on the other hand, provides a transparent and immutable method for tracking commitments and progress. Through the decentralized nature of blockchain technology, nations and corporations can be held to account in real-time, with their actions visible to both the global community and their own citizens.

Yet, technology alone is not enough. Private sector engagement will be equally critical in ensuring the success of the Pact. Companies have the resources, innovation, and global reach to drive meaningful change. By embedding sustainability metrics into corporate governance structures, businesses can align their strategies with the goals of the Pact, ensuring that they are part of the solution rather than exacerbating existing problems. Public-private partnerships will be particularly important, as they offer a mechanism for leveraging private sector expertise and investment in support of global sustainability initiatives.

Despite the technological and corporate innovations that could support the Pact’s goals, none of this will be possible without adequate funding. The scale of the challenges we face requires a substantial financial commitment, and traditional funding mechanisms may not be sufficient. As the world grapples with the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic, resource allocation has become even more constrained. However, innovative financing mechanisms offer a path forward. Global carbon taxes, green bonds tied to intergenerational projects, and voluntary contributions to a Global Fund for Future Generations are just a few of the options that could be explored to mobilize the necessary resources. These approaches would not only generate the financial support needed but also incentivize long-term thinking and sustainable practices across both public and private sectors.

Another critical factor in the successful implementation of the Pact is the need for regional adaptation. While the principles of the Pact are global in scope, their application will need to be tailored to the specific needs and contexts of different regions. Organizations like the African Union, Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN,) and the European Union are well-positioned to translate the Pact’s global commitments into locally relevant actions. The African Union’s Agenda 2063, for example, already aligns with many of the Pact’s principles and could serve as a model for regional implementation. By focusing on regional contexts, the Pact can achieve greater resonance and effectiveness at the local level.

Conclusion

The UN Pact for the Future represents an extraordinary opportunity to reshape global governance in a way that addresses both the immediate needs of today and the long-term challenges of tomorrow. However, its success will depend on more than just good intentions—it will require concrete, actionable strategies, adequate resources, and a commitment to accountability. By aligning national policies, engaging the private sector, leveraging technology, and exploring innovative financing mechanisms, the global community can turn the aspirations of the Pact into reality.

As UN Secretary-General António Guterres wisely stated, “The choices we make today—or fail to make—will shape our future for decades to come. Let us be remembered for choosing wisely and acting boldly for the sake of future generations.” His words remind us that the time for bold, collective action is now. The decisions we make today will determine the future we leave behind. There is no greater legacy we can offer future generations than a sustainable, equitable world that rises to the challenges of our time.

Policy Recommendations:

  1. Governments should increase funding for long-term sustainability projects by incorporating the welfare of future generations into national budgets.
  2. Civil society must commit to advocating for intergenerational equity through campaigns and pressure on policymakers.
  3. Corporations should embed sustainability metrics into their business strategies and governance structures, ensuring long-term alignment with global goals.
  4. Youth movements must map pathways for engagement in global governance to ensure their voices shape future policies.
  5. The UN and international institutions should leverage AI and blockchain for transparent monitoring and accountability of commitments.

 

Other articles by the same author:

Africa's coups: A challenge for UN conflict prevention efforts (3-minute read) 

Reinvigorating peace: A critical look at the UN's New Agenda for Peace (10-minute read)

 

 

Jordan Ryan is a member of the Toda International Research Advisory Council (TIRAC) at the Toda Peace Institute, a Senior Consultant to the Folke Bernadotte Academy (Sweden)  and former Vice President for Peace at The Carter Center. He recently completed an assignment as the lead author of the UN integration review for the Executive Office of the Secretary-General. Mr. Ryan served as UN Assistant Secretary-General and UNDP Assistant Administrator from 2009-2014, was Deputy Special Representative in Liberia, and UN Resident Coordinator in Vietnam. He holds graduate degrees from Columbia University and George Washington University and received his B.A. from Yale University. He was also a fellow at Harvard's Kennedy School.