Policy Briefs and Reports Books Journals

Policy Briefs on Cooperative Security, Arms Control and Disarmament

Cooperative Security, Arms Control and Disarmament

A Sceptic’s Take on the Nuclear Bomb

Report  No.239 - August, 2025 • By Ramesh Thakur

This report states that the spread of nuclear weapons to a total of nine countries today, and the spell they cast on the leaders and scientists of many other countries who are enchanted by the magic of the bomb, rests on several mutually reinforcing myths. The author outlines these myths and the five paradoxes which set the context for the global nuclear arms control agenda. The possession of nuclear weapons by nine countries leaves the world exposed to the risk of sleepwalking into a nuclear disaster. A more rational and prudent approach to reducing nuclear risks would be to actively advocate and pursue the minimisation, reduction, and elimination agendas for the short, medium, and long terms.

Cooperative Security, Arms Control and Disarmament

A New Normal in India-Pakistan Relations in the Age of Cross-border Terrorism

Policy Brief  No.222 - May, 2025 • By Ramesh Thakur

This policy brief backgrounds the killing of 26 domestic tourists in Pahalgam, Kashmir by terrorists in April 2025 and the subsequent Operation Sindoor launched by India on alleged terrorist and military targets in Pakistan. It draws comparisons with the Israel-Palestine conflict, and concludes with recommendations for both India and Pakistan to work towards normalising bilateral relationships, and for international actors such as the United Nations to encourage efforts to shift the balance towards more peace and less violence.

Cooperative Security, Arms Control and Disarmament

Adapting Co-operative Security: The OSCE's Challenges and Opportunities in a Fragmented World

Report  No.218 - April, 2025 • By Fred Tanner

This report examines the evolution of co-operative security, the role of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) in arms control, crisis management, and emerging transnational threats such as cyber risks, migration, and climate change. In the face of a shift to fragmented, self-interested policies, the OSCE now faces unprecedented challenges due to geopolitical rivalries and institutional paralysis. With its consensus-based structure increasingly obstructed, alternative mechanisms—such as coalitions of the willing, structured dialogue, and flexible diplomatic formats—are proposed to sustain co-operative security. The paper concludes by assessing the OSCE’s potential role in post-war Ukraine and the broader European security architecture.

Cooperative Security, Arms Control and Disarmament

Taking Stock — Moving Forward: Opportunities and Shortcomings from the Pact for the Future’s ‘International Peace and Security’ Actions

Summary Report  No.215 - March, 2025 • By Apolline Foedit and Keith Krause

This report captures the key insights and debates from a two-day international conference on the Pact for the Future, convened by the CCDP and the Toda Peace Institute on 30–31 January 2025. The conference explored pressing questions, such as: What role can the Pact for the Future play in strengthening global peace and security? How can it address the growing challenges of multilateralism at a time when international cooperation seems increasingly fragile? What opportunities does it offer for advancing inclusive governance and conflict prevention? This report sheds light on the Pact for the Future’s implications for peace and security and the opportunities it presents for more effective and inclusive global governance.

Cooperative Security, Arms Control and Disarmament

Exceptionalism and Rules-Based Order: From Biden to Trump

Report  No.213 - March, 2025 • By Sverre Lodgaard

This report examines the idea of American exceptionalism and the move from a Biden to a Trump presidency. After World War II, the new international order was unthinkable without American leadership. The USA was indispensable. The perception of excellence made Americans distance themselves from the old world’s corruption and colonial entanglements, and belief in their own moral superiority convinced the rulers that the USA had to lead the world by setting a good example and by using force if necessary. Now, the new president believes that to make America great again, the relationship with the outside world must become less burdensome. With a presidency centred on domestic affairs and the combination of lack of respect for liberal values and norms; dismantling of international commitments; focus on military strength, but not on war; preference for bilateral agreements; and unpredictability—all of it underpinned by a strong political mandate at home—Trump believes the USA should become a showcase for the rest of the world to admire.